Promise of the Spirit
The Gift of the Spirit is one of the blessings of Abraham promised by God for the nations and the children of the Patriarch.
The Apostle Paul referred to the “Promise of the Spirit” which he equated with the “Blessing of Abraham.” Jesus subjected himself to the “curse” of the Law to redeem believers so that the “Blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ, that we might receive the Promise of the Spirit through faith.”
Elsewhere he wrote that believers were “sealed with the Holy Spirit of Promise, the earnest of our inheritance, until the redemption of the purchased possession.” The Gift of the Spirit is the down payment and guarantee of the coming full possession of the inheritance for all men and women who respond positively to the “faith of Jesus Christ” - (Ephesians 1:13-14).
[Photo by Luke Vodell on Unsplash] |
The Greek term translated as “purchased possession” in Ephesians echoes the land promise made to Abraham. God gave the Land of Canaan to him and his “seed” for an “everlasting possession.” Paul links the Gift of the Spirit to the covenant promises, including the Land of Canaan - (Genesis 17:8, Ephesians 1:13-14).
Jesus called the Gift of the Spirit the “Promise of the Father.” Before his Ascension, he commanded his disciples to wait in Jerusalem until they received the “Promise of the Father.” It was granted to the Church on the Day of Pentecost when the promised era of the Spirit commenced, the “last days” - (Luke 24:49, Acts 1:4, 2:16-21).
The Promise was never limited to that first group of believers, the events of the Day of Pentecost, or the biological descendants of Abraham. The gift given on Pentecost was for “your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God will call to him” – (Acts 2:39).
Chapter 10 of the Book of Acts describes the opening of the Gospel to the Gentiles. At the height of Peter’s sermon, the Spirit fell on the Gentiles, and they “began to speak in tongues.” The Jews who accompanied Peter were amazed since the Spirit fell on uncircumcised Gentiles “just as on us at the beginning,” referring to the earlier outpouring of the Gift on the Day of Pentecost - (Acts 10:44-48).
In response to his critics in Jerusalem, Peter pointed to the Gift of the Spirit as indisputable evidence that God had accepted believing Gentiles into His covenant community without the rite of circumcision. The Gentiles received the same Gift as the circumcised and Torah-observant Jewish followers of Jesus. So, how could anyone insist that Gentiles must also be circumcised?
GALATIA
In his first argument to the Assembly of Galatia, Paul applied the same logic as Peter. Since members of the largely Gentile congregation had received the Spirit “from faith” while yet uncircumcised, why were they now contemplating the addition of circumcision and other “works of the Law” to “complete” their faith? – (Galatians 3:1-4).
Rather than “completion,” adopting circumcision would obligate them to keep the entire Mosaic legislation. Inevitably they would fall under the Law’s “curse,” yet God gave them the Spirit “through the hearing of faith,” and not “from the works of the Law,” including circumcision – (Galatians 3:5-10).
Next, Paul presented an argument from the life of Abraham. The underlying issue was circumcision, the “sign of the covenant” given to Abraham. Nevertheless, God declared the Patriarch righteous from his faith before the rite of circumcision was even commanded - (“Even as Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him for righteousness”).
In contrast to believing Abraham, “as many as are from the works of the law are under a curse… cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things written in the Book of the Law.” Fortunately, Jesus “redeemed us from the curse of the law,” therefore, believers receive the promised Gift of the Spirit through faith. The Gift is not acquired through the deeds and rituals of the Mosaic Law – (Galatians 3:10-14).
The promises were for Abraham and “his seed, Christ,” and the “inheritance” was from “promise,” not “from the Law,” otherwise, the promise would be voided. Since the Law came after the covenant confirmed by God, it could not add to, subtract from, or otherwise “disannul the Promise” – (Galatians 3:15-21).
The Law was added to deal with “transgressions,” not to justify anyone or undo the promises, and only “until” the “Seed came.” The time element is pivotal to Paul’s argument. The previous administration under the Mosaic legislation was in force only until the arrival of the Messiah. Since the “faith” had arrived in Jesus Christ, the true “Seed of Abraham,” believers were no longer “under the custodian,” that is, the jurisdiction of the Law of Moses – (Galatians 3:22-25).
All believers become “sons of God through the faith of Christ Jesus,” both Jews and Gentiles. Therefore, no longer can there be “Jew or Greek, bond or free, male and female, for all are one in Christ Jesus.” The old distinctions are inappropriate in the Assembly of God built on the Death and Resurrection of Jesus – (Galatians 3:26-28).
The Gift of the Spirit poured out on the Day of Pentecost was not something unforeseen or made necessary by later events. The “Promise of the Spirit” was always an integral part of the “Blessings of Abraham” for the nations, and all men who receive it become the “children of Abraham” and heirs of the covenant promises.
The New Covenant inaugurated by Jesus was never intended to replace the Abrahamic Covenant. Instead, it fulfills it.
[PDF Copy]
SEE ALSO:
- The Promise is for you! - (The Gift of the Spirit is for every man who repents, even to those afar off, and in fulfillment of the promise of the Father - Acts 2:37-41)
- The Blessing of Abraham - (The Gift of the Spirit bestowed by Jesus is part of God’s covenant promise to bless all the nations in Abraham’s Seed)
- The Covenant Promise - (The promise to bless all nations in Abraham is brought to fulfillment by Jesus of Nazareth, the true Seed of Abraham)
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.