His Supremacy

The Letter to the Hebrews is addressed to a congregation facing pressure from outsiders, and some members are contemplating withdrawing from the assembly and returning to the local synagogue. The Letter presents arguments for why doing so will have catastrophic consequences by stressing the superiority of the “Word of the Son” over the past revelations. The concern is pastoral, and the purpose is to prevent believers from leaving the congregation and apostatizing. And Hebrews urges them to remain faithful to the apostolic traditions.

Faithfulness is the proper response to trials and persecution, and the Letter warns of the dire consequences of faithlessness to the vastly superior “word” that God has given in His “Son.” Abandoning the church and returning to the synagogue would lead inevitably to apostasy, the rejection of Jesus, and severe judgment on the offender - (Hebrews 2:1-4, 6:1-12, 10:22-30).

COMPARISONS


The Letter employs a rhetorical technique called synkrisis. It consists of comparisons that demonstrate the superiority of one thing over another. For example, it highlights the superiority of the “Son” over what God did under the “former covenant.”

The purpose is not to denigrate His past revelations but to emphasize how much the glory of the new surpasses the old. Between each comparison, Hebrews presents dire warnings against deserting Jesus.

The Letter compares the “Word” of the Son to that of angels, Moses, and Joshua, his priesthood with the Aaronic priesthood, his one-time sacrifice with the required repeated animal sacrifices of the Levitical code, and the “former” covenant with the New Covenant inaugurated by the “Son.”

The previous “words” in the “prophets” were partial (“in many parts”), and delivered by various means (prophecy, visions, dreams). The “word” spoken in the “Son” differs in at least three ways. First, God spoke “of old,” but now, He speaks “upon these last days.” Second, He spoke to the “fathers,” but now, “to us.” And third, He spoke “in the prophets,” but now, in one who is a “Son.”

As true and gracious as God’s past disclosures were, they were promissory and incomplete. Thus, a fuller word was needed. The past “word” was not incorrect, but partial. In contrast, His complete “word” is now “spoken in a Son.”

Upon the last of these days” provides the time element. With the death and resurrection of Jesus, God’s people have entered a new era and the time of fulfillment has commenced - (Acts 2:17, Galatians 4:4, Ephesians 1:10).

SON, HEIR, PRIEST


God appointed the Son as “the heir of all things.”  This alludes to the second Psalm where Yahweh promised to give His “son” the “nations as an inheritance.” It is one of two messianic Psalms that figure prominently in the epistle:

  • (Psalm 2:8) – “Ask of me and LET ME GIVE NATIONS AS YOUR INHERITANCE, and as your possession, the ends of the earth.
  • (Psalm 110:1-4) – “Yahweh said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool… Yahweh has sworn and will not repent, YOU WILL BE A PRIEST TO TIMES EVERLASTING AFTER THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK.” – (Emphasis added in both preceding passages).

But the Letter expands the original promise. The Son is the “heir of ALL THINGS,” not just the “nations” or the “Earth.” And the mention of his “inheritance” echoes the covenant promises to Abraham since Jesus is the true heir of the patriarch.

Moreover, the “Son” is the “eradiated brightness of the glory and the exact impress of His very essence.” He reflects the very glory and likeness of his Father. The point is the surpassing greatness of the position Jesus holds as High Priest.

And he gained his status as the “high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek” through his past accomplishment - “having achieved the purification of sins, he was appointed heir of all things.” This last clause anticipates the Letter’s later discussions about his priesthood, covenant, and once-for-all sacrifice.

Jesus “sat down on the right hand of majesty.”  While this applies to his royal reign, more importantly, it refers to his priestly role and activities, especially his entrance into the “Holy of Holies” where he now intercedes on behalf of his people.

The Greek term rendered “sat down” contrasts HIS priestly act with the Aaronic high priest who entered the “Holy of Holies” only on the annual Day of Atonement, and only for a very brief time. And the latter NEVER SAT DOWN in the inner sanctum. Yet Jesus did exactly that – he “sat down” - only in the greater and true Tabernacle “in the highest heaven” now cleansed by his own blood. His act demonstrated the completeness of his once-only sacrifice - (Hebrews 7:26-27, 10:11-12).

And he entered the heavenly sanctuary “once-for-all” through his sacrifice, thereby obtaining everlasting redemption for his people. And stressing that he “sat down” also indicates the PERMANENCE of his position as the High Priest “forever.”

MORE EXCELLENT NAME


Jesus “became so much better than the angels,” having advanced beyond them by inheriting “a more excellent name.” In this context, that name is “Son.” The “word spoken in a son” is superior to all past revelations in two ways. First, it is the last in a long series of revelations (“Upon these last days”). Second, it is the culmination of all that preceded him, the “perfecter of our faith” - (Hebrews 12:1-2).

The Letter argues FROM LESSER TO GREATER. Angels are God’s ministers. Moses was His servant. But the sonly word is superior to any previous message whether mediated by angels, prophets, or the great Lawgiver. But rejecting his word will result in far greater punishment than any disobedience under the Mosaic law.

In summary, the Letter to the Hebrews compares the “word spoken in a son” with the past revelations made through prophets, angels, priests, and Moses. It demonstrates the surpassing greatness of the final revelation provided by God in His Son and warns of the danger of abandoning and thereby repudiating it.


Comments

POPULAR POSTS

Language of the New Testament

Two Little Horns?