Days of Noah
Just as the unprepared were destroyed by the Flood, so unrepentant men and apostates will be overtaken by destruction when Jesus returns.
Jesus compared the final years before
his return to the period leading up to the Great Flood. “As it was in the
days of Noah, so shall it be.” Some take this as a prediction of a return
to the same conditions that existed in Noah’s time, the repetition of the moral
anarchy and violence that prompted God to send floodwaters. The final days will
be marked by chaos and catastrophes - [Floodwaters - Photo by Lukas Hron on Unsplash].
But that interpretation of
Christ’s words ignores the literary context and the point of his analogy. The
fuller version of his saying recorded in Luke compares that final period
to both the “days of Noah” and the “days of Lot” to stress the
same point:
- (Luke 17:26-30) – “And as it came to pass in the days of Noah, even so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They ate, they drank, they married, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. Likewise, even as it came to pass in the days of Lot; they ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built; but in the day that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all: after the same manner shall it be in the day that the Son of man is revealed.”
Since no one except God alone knows
the timing of that day, we must always be prepared for its sudden arrival. The comparison
with the “days of Noah” illustrates the point. Jesus said nothing about the
return of gross sin, violence, or terrestrial upheaval - whether such things will
occur in history’s final years was not the point.
Instead, just as before the
Flood, men will go about their daily routines, “eating, drinking, marrying,
planting, building, buying and selling.” This describes everyday life, not
chaos or egregious sin. Men will go about their business as if nothing untoward
is about to happen, despite the testimony of preachers of righteousness - (2
Peter 2:5, “If God did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah,
a herald of righteousness…).
At the time just before the
Flood, the error of men was the failure to heed the call for repentance by Noah.
Humanity went about its business as if the judgment would never occur, right up
until the moment destruction fell. The analogy stresses the indifference of men
to
the warnings of inevitable judgment and not the wickedness of that generation.
Only Noah and his family believed God “about things not yet seen” and therefore,
he prepared the ark - (Hebrews 11:7).
For the rest of humanity, the
Flood arrived without warning. Likewise, the sudden arrival of the “Son of
Man” will catch many off their guard. The conditions described by Jesus portray
normalcy, not chaos.
In Luke, Jesus stated
that the kingdom would not come “with observable signs” (paratérésis),
which translates a Greek word used by medical practitioners for diagnosing
diseases from observable symptoms, as well as for making close astronomical
observations.
The timing of his arrival cannot be calculated by discerning the significance of cosmic signs. When he does come, it will be like “lightning flashing out of the one part under heaven and flashing into the other part under heaven” - sudden, unmistakable, and visible to all.
Jesus added an illustration
from the “days of Lot.” Before the “Son of Man” arrives, people
will go about their regular affairs, “eating, drinking, marrying, being
given in marriage, buying, selling, planting and building.” But in Lot’s time,
fire fell from heaven suddenly and destroyed Sodom, and so “will it be on the
day the Son of Man is revealed.”
Later, Jesus warned against
becoming too comfortable in this life. Disciples must take heed:
- “Lest at any time their hearts are overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness and the cares of this life, and so that day comes upon (ephistémi) them unexpected (aiphnidios). For just as a snare shall it come upon all those who dwell on the face of the whole earth. Watch, therefore, and pray always to be accounted worthy to escape (ekpheugō) all these things.” – (Luke 21:34-36).
The Apostle Paul used this same
saying of Jesus in his letter to the Thessalonians to make a similar point:
- (1 Thessalonians 5:2-3) - “For yourselves know accurately that the day of the Lord is coming thus as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, ‘Peace and safety,’ then unexpected (aiphnidios) destruction comes upon (ephistémi) them as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape (ekpheugō).”
“Unexpected” (aiphnidios)
occurs nowhere else in the New Testament, except in these two passages.
According to Paul, the “Day of the Lord” will arrive when it is least
expected, “just like a thief in the night.” Humanity’s claim to have
established “peace and safety” points to times of normalcy, not chaos,
upheaval, or violence. Likewise, Peter warned of the coming time when:
- “Scoffers walking after their own lusts who will scoff; Where is the promise of his coming, for since the fathers fell asleep all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation!” - (2 Peter 3:2-4).
In times of global catastrophes,
even atheists tend to believe something “apocalyptic” is imminent. But during
times of peace and prosperity, the human temptation is to assume that life will
continue as usual, and with little anxiety about the end of the age and no
motivation to prepare for it.
Jesus painted a picture of normalcy for the
period prior to his return, not one characterized by cosmic catastrophes and
moral anarchy. The unprepared will be overtaken by the sudden and unexpected “arrival
of the Son of Man.”
That was the point of his analogy. No one
knows the day or hour of his coming, and no one can calculate it. That day will
arrive suddenly and without warning, “like a thief in the night,”
therefore, his followers must always be prepared for its sudden arrival.
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.