Doing the Whole Law
OVERVIEW – Anyone who is under the Law of Moses is obligated to keep all its required deeds and rituals – Galatians 3:10.
In his Letter to the Galatians, the Apostle Paul
responded to teachings from certain Jewish Christians that were disrupting the
churches of Galatia. A key point of contention was the claim that male Gentiles
must be circumcised to “complete” their faith. Additionally, they may have pressured
believers to keep the calendrical observances of the Mosaic legislation and
conform to Jewish dietary regulations - [Photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash].
The “Judaizers,” as Paul labeled them, did not deny the
need for faith; rather, they taught that once Gentiles came to faith in Jesus,
performing at least some “works of the Law” was necessary to
complete their faith:
- (Galatians 3:1-5) – “So foolish are ye, having begun in Spirit, are you now to be made complete by the flesh?”
But the Apostle would have none of it. He labeled them “agitators”
who were causing divisions by compelling Gentiles to “live like Jews.”
The real controversy was over the status of Gentiles in the covenant
people. To be a member in good standing, must a Gentile add circumcision
and other works of the Torah to his faith in Jesus?
Paul’s Response. He did not charge his
opponents with compelling Gentiles to keep the entire Law. Some verses
indicate they insisted that Gentiles must keep only certain requirements, especially
circumcision, but not, necessarily, every requirement demanded by Law given
through Moses - (Galatians 3:10, 5:2-3).
The Apostle’s main proposition is recorded in Galatians
2:15-21, where he presented what he held in common with his opponents
(verses 15-16), then summarized the areas of disagreement (verses 17-21):
- “We ourselves by nature Jews and not sinners from among the Gentiles, know that man is not declared righteous on the basis of the works of the law but through the faith of Christ Jesus; even we believed in Christ Jesus that we might be declared righteous on the basis of the faith of Christ and not on the basis of the works of the law; because from the works of the law will no flesh be declared righteous.”
What he and his opponents held in common was that no man is put in
right standing with God “from the works of the Law,” but instead, “from
the faith of Jesus Christ.” The agitators were adding requirements to this
faith. At issue was not good works, but the deeds required by the Mosaic Law, which
included circumcision. In the context of this letter, the “works of the law”
can only refer to the requirements of the Torah given through
Moses.
In chapter 3, Paul began to present his arguments to
support the proposition, beginning with an argument from experience, the
receipt of the Spirit while the Galatians were yet uncircumcised. This was
irrefutable proof that God had accepted Gentile believers on their faith, and
without the rite of circumcision.
Doing the Whole Law. Next, Paul presented
arguments from Scripture. He appealed to the example of Abraham and linked him
to faith, righteousness, and the promised “blessing” for Gentiles. The
Patriarch was “reckoned righteous” from his faith, not from the “deeds
of the law,” therefore, all who are from faith are the “sons of Abraham.”
- (Galatians 3:10-13) - “For as many as are from the works of the Law are under a curse, for it is written, ‘Accursed is everyone who continues not in all things that are written in the book of the law, to do them.’”
In contrast to those “from faith,” those who are “from
the works of the Law” place themselves under its curse. The Law
itself pronounced that all those under it are obligated “to continue
in ALL the things written in the Book of the Law, to do them”
- (Deuteronomy 27:26).
The Law was not a pick-and-choose menu, but an all-or-nothing proposition. If one is under it, just observing the Sabbath or getting circumcision is insufficient to avoid its curse. One must do all that the Law requires.
Gentile believers contemplating the addition of circumcision to
their faith must understand that much more is involved than the removal of the
foreskin. The Torah requires members of the covenant
community to do all that is written in it, and those
who are living from the “works of the Law” fall under its curse if they
fail to do so.
At Mount Sinai, Israel placed herself under the obligations of the
covenant, and thereby, under its (potential) curse. The curse was pronounced
against all who failed to continue in all that the Law required. The Galatians
were considering a decision with potentially dire consequences.
In his letter, Paul connected the preposition “under”
to the Law ten times, and always negatively.
Thus, he referred to those who are “under sin”, “under the Law,”
“under a custodian,”, “under guardians,” and “under the
elemental principles” of the world. Those who are “under the Law”
are not classified as people “from faith.” Instead, they need of
redemption “from under the Law” - (Galatians 3:22-25, 4:2-5, 4:21,
5:18).
His argument was covenantal. He was not arguing against doing good
works in general, but instead, against placing oneself under the requirements
and obligations of the Mosaic Law. The act of circumcision did just that; it obligated
the man under it to do all that the Torah demanded.
The curse pronounced in Deuteronomy was not
against all humanity or sin in general. The curse fell on ALL who
failed to do everything that the Law required; it applied only to those who were
under it.
Consequences of
Submission to Torah. If Gentile believers choose to get circumcised, Jesus and his
work on the cross ceases to benefit them. Instead, they must now keep the
entire Law, because submission to circumcision places them under the covenant
made with Israel at Sinai.
- (Galatians 5:2-3) - “Behold! I, Paul, am saying to you. If you get circumcised, Christ will benefit you nothing. Moreover, I bear solemn witness again to every man getting circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.”
If the Galatians placed themselves under Torah, they would
cease to be under the covenant instituted by the death of Jesus. It was one or
the other. Christ endured the Law’s curse so his followers would not - (“You
have been set aside from Christ, you who are to be declared righteous from the
Law”).
According to the Apostle Paul, “if righteousness is through the
Law, then Christ died in vain.” Thus, anyone who teaches that faith
in what God has done in Jesus is insufficient for determining membership in His
people, intentionally or not, has declared that his unjust death on a Roman
cross served no real purpose, that, effectively, he “died for nothing.”
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.